Winter of the World by Ken Follett

A quick rundown…The second book in the Century trilogy focuses on World War II, continuing the tale with the same families introduced in Fall of Giants.

Strengths: Well researched, some gripping scenes.

Weaknesses: Long and dreary in stretches and the Holocaust is two lines.

Why I read it: I enjoyed Fall of Giants.

Pages: 818

Published: 2012

Publisher: Macmillan

Setting: Europe, USA, Pacific

Rating: 6.5 out of 10

I was really looking forward to this book after reading Fall of Giants, which I loved. Despite my vow to read the second heavy book as an eBook, that didn’t happen as I received this book for Christmas. It’s another heavy tome at 818 pages and it took me simply ages to read it, much longer than I had expected. Why? Because it was quite boring in parts.

Those of you who have read Ken Follett’s other massive chunksters (such as The Pillars of the Earth) know that he can be a real page turner. Unfortunately, this one wasn’t. I was begging for World War II to start because I knew there would be action. Yes, the pace did pick up as the war continued and some of the preamble of the 1930s – rise of Hitler and Fascism was necessary but I felt like the book needed an edit.

This time round we know the families involved (and once again, there’s a list if you’ve forgotten) and the children have grown up to fight again for freedom. We cover the German aspect with the von Ulrich family, England with the Williams’ and Fitzherberts, Russia with the Peshkovs and the USA with the (other) Peshkovs and Dewars. Everyone is as intermingled as a soap opera, but that’s not a bad thing as it gets the characters to the critical points in history.

If I had to some up this book in one word it would be politics. Everyone seems to be very politically focused or motivated and many inches are devoted to elections and political discussions. I understand that it’s necessary to understand the motivations behind WWII, but I got very sick of reading about Fascism and Black Shirts.

The parts of WWII that were covered were very broad. The focus is mainly on the war in Europe, with Chuck Dewar being the lone main character fighting the Japanese in the Pacific. There is some coverage of the development of the atom bomb but very little on the effects of it on the Japanese people, which was disappointing (surely a minor character could have been there to give some account of the devastation). Australia also doesn’t get much of mention (despite Darwin and other northern parts being bombed) and I don’t think anyone mentions the fall of Singapore. Being Australian and having family who fought in that area, I am possibly sensitive on this subject, wanting recognition of those who fought. But this book is English, so it focuses more on the European front.

Or does it? There is no mention of the Holocaust; just two characters mentioning that there’s a rumour Jewish people are being killed deliberately. That’s it. No mention of the horrors of Auschwitz (once again, with a big cast, couldn’t someone have stumbled past at a crucial moment?). The elderly and disabled are mentioned as being killed indiscriminately, but nothing of the Jewish people.

The parts of the war that were covered in detail were well researched, such as the making of the atom bomb and bombing of Pearl Harbor. I also learned a lot about the Spanish Civil War, which I didn’t know much about.

The book is definitely impressive, but it’s by no means a book about all the aspects of WWII – and not even some of the major ones. For that, I’m disappointed. I am impressed with the plotting and characterisation (as much as I have been cheeky about it, it does take a lot of effort to get those characters in the right place at the right time). Some of the language was mundane at times (he said, she replied, he said blah blah); at other times (such as describing starving people in Berlin) I felt I had a front row seat. I’d leave this one to Follett fans.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Winter of the World by Ken Follett

Add yours

  1. I am not sure how you can have a book about WWII that only touches on the Holocaust in that way!

    One day I will read Follett but I won’t be starting with this one!

  2. Maybe there comes a time when an author needs to lay down his idea. Or, at least the number of pages he writes. I did like Pillars of the Earth but not so much I’ve felt to compelled to read more of him. When it comes to Follett, I prefer his thrillers such as Key to Rebecca.

  3. I haven’t read this book yet, but I’ve seen people think just like you, that it is more boring than the first. I will read it anyway, of course, but well, now I can expect that it isn’t like other of his novels.
    About Spanish civil war (I’m Spanish), the only good thing we had after it was that we were not able to join in the WWII because the country was destroyed, but it was really cruel. I recommend Orwell’s book “Homage to Catalonia”, about his own participation in “our” war. I just see those people as heroes: they were foreign people who tried to help us against fascism, even though the war was in other country.

  4. I really enjoyed this book, but I do see your point about how he glossed over certain periods and events. However, if he properly included everything I can’t imagine how long the book would be 🙂

I enjoy reading your comments! Thanks for stopping by.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: